Testing TCP Connectivity on Cisco Devices

Testing TCP Connectivity on Cisco Devices

Ever thought you might be having some Layer 4 connectivity issues? Pings as you should know are ICMP transmissions and ICMP is a Layer 3 protocol (commonly used to send error messages). Luckily Cisco has a hidden ( as in it wont show up when using IOS help ) utility for testing TCP connectivity.

The command, ttcp is actually a very powerful tool for testing TCP connections, it requires IOS 11.2 or higher with IP Plus or Service Provider images. Here is an example of it being used to test connectivity between two locations.

text
SiteA#ttcp
transmit or receive [receive]:
buflen [8192]:
bufalign [16384]:
bufoffset [0]:
port [5001]:
sinkmode [y]:
rcvwndsize [2144]: 4096
show tcp information at end [n]:
ttcp-r: buflen=8192, nbuf=2048, align=16384/0, port=5001, rcvwndsize=4096  tcp
SiteA#

SiteB#ttcp
transmit or receive [receive]: trans
Target IP address: 137.112.32.66
buflen [8192]:
nbuf [2048]: 50
bufalign [16384]:
bufoffset [0]:
port [5001]:
sinkmode [y]:
buffering on writes [y]:
show tcp information at end [n]:
ttcp-t: buflen=8192, nbuf=50, align=16384/0, port=5001  tcp  -> 137.112.32.66
SiteB#

SiteA#
ttcp-r: accept from 137.112.32.65 (mss 1460, sndwnd 2144, rcvwnd 4096)
ttcp-r: 409600 bytes in 61064 ms (61.064 real seconds) (~5 kB/sec) +++
ttcp-r: 301 I/O calls
ttcp-r: 0 sleeps (0 ms total) (0 ms average)
SiteA#

SiteB#
ttcp-t: connect (mss 1460, sndwnd 4096, rcvwnd 2144)
ttcp-t: 409600 bytes in 60504 ms (60.504 real seconds) (~5 kB/sec) +++
ttcp-t: 50 I/O calls
ttcp-t: 0 sleeps (0 ms total) (0 ms average)
SiteB#

The downside of ttcp is that it really makes me miss tcpspray for Linux / on ImageStream routers. As you see in this example ttcp requires that you start the receiver process on the remote end, while tcpspray just uses the echo and discard inetd services. I’ll cover some details about tcpspray in a future post.

Obviously another advantage of this utility is speed testing. Obviously, this is not a reliable means to test high bandwidth links as the router needs enough CPU to generate the packets. If your bandwidth tests are not pegging the router and you’re still not happy with the results, latency could be the issue. Check our my previous post on the relationship between latency and throughput.

comments powered by Disqus

Related Posts

Nexus 1000v – Out of Ports on a Virtual Switch?

Nexus 1000v – Out of Ports on a Virtual Switch?

Yesterday, work presented an interesting issue I wanted to share with everyone. While configuring a new virtual machine one of our systems engineers was presented with an issue he …

More BGP tricks

More BGP tricks

At times, the ‘rules of BGP’ don’t fit the needs of our productions networks. When we get into today’s production networks how often do book configurations apply? I’ll tell you one …

IOS ACL Resequencing

IOS ACL Resequencing

This is one of those tricks you wish you learned about 10 years ago, but never did. You know how easy it is to mess up a nice looking access list. You get one setup on the router, …